This website is available in two places:
http://bicycle.tudelft.nl/stablebicycle/
http://ruina.tam.cornell.edu/research/topics/bicycle_mechanics/stablebicycle/

### The paper and supporting material

1) Preprint: 4 page pdf
2) Supporting text: 50 page pdf
3) Simultaneously posted history paper:
(40 page pdf)
History of thoughts about bicycle self-stability
J. P. Meijaard, Jim M. Papadopoulos, Andy Ruina, and A. L. Schwab

Background

Long known, but still amazing, is that a moving bicycle can balance itself (see videos). Most people think this balance follows from a gyroscopic effect. That's what Felix Klein (of the Klein bottle), Arnold Sommerfeld (nominated for the Nobel prize 81 times) and Fritz Noether (Emmy's brother) thought [1]. On the other hand a famous paper by David Jones [2] (published twice in Physics Today) claims bicycle stability is also because of something called "trail". Trail is the distance the front wheel trails behind the steer axis. The front wheel of a shopping cart castor trails behind its support bearing and so must a bicycle front wheel, Jones reasoned. Jones insisted that trail was a necessary part of bicycle stability.

We suspected that such simple images (above) were missing at least part of the picture.

To find the essence of bicycle self balance we looked at simpler and simpler dynamical models until we found a minimal two-mass-skate (TMS) bicycle that theory told us should be self-stable. This bicycle has no gyroscopic effect and no trail. We built a bicycle (of sorts) based on the theory to prove the point.

This bicycle proves that self-stability cannot be explained in any simple words. Bicycles are not stable because of gyros, because you can make a self stable bicycle without gyros. We did that. And they are not stable because of trail, you can take that away too. And we did that. More positively, we have shown that the distribution of mass, especially the location of the center of mass of the front assembly, has as strong an influence on bicycle stability as do gyros and trail.

Why can a bicycle balance itself? One necessary condition for bicycle self stability is (once we define the words carefully) that such a bicycle turns into a fall.

The paper and supplementary material describe the problem and our solution in more detail.

This research was started by Jim Papadopoulos, working with Andy Ruina and Scott Hand at Cornell in 1985. The basic theoretical result was in-hand then. In some sense, the recent Proceedings of the Royal Society paper on bicycle stability [3] was written to support the present paper. We couldn't publish this gyro-free-no-trail result without that foundation being in the literature. The experimental two-mass-skate (TMS) bicycle, and the fleshing out of the theory, were carried out by Jodi Kooijman and Arend Schwab at Delft University of Technology, starting in 2008. Jaap Meijaard found the key errors in Klein & Sommerfeld  [1] and in Whipple [4].

 Here is a video of Arend Schwab narrating the text above: low res:  promovideov2small.mp4 (7.2MB) HD (warning: large file!):  promovideov2.mp4 (261MB) (1920x1080) or on  Youtube.
 Here is a video of Andy Ruina explaining how bicycles balance: medium res:  stablebicycle640.mov (71MB) HD (warning: large file!): stablebicycleHD.mov (316MB) Link 1 | Link 2 or on Youtube

References:

[1] F. Klein and A. Sommerfeld. Über die Theorie des Kreisels. Teubner, Leipzig, 1910. Ch IX §8, Stabilität des Fahrrads, by F. Noether, pp. 863–884.
(pdf+English translation).

[2] D. E. H. Jones. The stability of the bicycle. Physics Today, 23(4):34–40, 1970. DOI:10.10631/1.3022064 (2006  DOI:10.1063/1.2364246)

[3] J. P. Meijaard, Jim M. Papadopoulos, Andy Ruina, and A. L. Schwab. Linearized dynamics equations for the balance and steer of a bicycle: a benchmark and review. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 463:1955–1982, 2007. DOI:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857 (pdf)

[4] F. J. W. Whipple. The stability of the motion of a bicycle. Quart. J. Pure Appl. Math. 30:312–348, 1899.

Yellow Bicycle stability demonstration photos and videos:
http://bicycle.tudelft.nl/yellowbicycle/

Andy Ruina's Bicycle Mechanics and Dynamics webpage:
http://ruina.tam.cornell.edu/research/topics/bicycle_mechanics/overview.html

Arend L. Schwab's Bicycle Mechanics and Dynamics:
http://bicycle.tudelft.nl/schwab/Bicycle/index.htm

VIDEOS:

 Video 1, basic experiment: (also on Science website) full size: 1201959Video1BasicExperiment.mov (9.8MB) low res: 1201959Video1BasicExperiment.mp4 (1.2MB) or on Youtube. This video shows two typical experimental runs, both at stable forward speed. The first run shows stable straight ahead motion, and the second run shows laterally perturbed stable motions. Video 2, counter-spinning wheels: (also on Science website) full size: 1201959Video2CounterSpinningWheels.mov (4.7MB) low res: 1201959Video2CounterSpinningWheels.mp4 (0.6MB) or on Youtube. This video demonstrates the working of the front counter-spinning wheel which eliminates the spin angular momentum of the front wheel. Video 3, measuring trail: (also on Science website) full size: 1201959Video3MeasuringTrail.mov (22.3MB) low res: 1201959Video3MeasuringTrail.mp4 (2.9MB) or on Youtube. This video shows how we measured the small negative trail (caster) on the experimental two-mass-skate (TMS) bicycle. A piece of paper is placed underneath the front wheel and stuck to the ground with tape. The front wheel is lowered and now touches the paper whereas the rear frame of the bicycle is clamped to prevent it from moving. The handlebars are then turned either way a number of times, marking the paper. The bicycle is removed from the clamp and the mark on the paper is examined. The mark follows an arc, a line is drawn tangentially to either end of the mark. The point where the two lines cross indicates the point about which the wheel rotates. Next the line for the middle of the contact point is drawn on the paper. The distance from the centre point to the arc is the trail. When we measured the trail this way it turned out to be -4  mm, that is center of the contact region was 4 mm ahead of the intersection of the steer axis with the ground.
 Video 4, slow motion: (also on Science website) full size: 1201959Video4SlowMotion.mov (26.9MB) low res: 1201959Video4SlowMotion.mp4 (3.4MB) or on Youtube. This is a high speed video (300 fps) of one of the experiments where we measured the lateral motions with a wireless inertial sensor (Philips Pi-Node) and forward speed by post-facto counting frames.
 High Def Composite (very large file): 1201959_HD_StableBicycleTeaser.mov (0.4GB) (1920x1080) or on Youtube. This HD video gives an overview of the two-mass-skate (TMS) bicycle and it's stable motions. High Def Experiments 1 High Speed Perturbed Stable (very large file): 1201959_HD_StableBicycleExp1.mov (1.2GB) (1920x1080) or on Youtube. This HD video shows that the two-mass-skate (TMS) bicycle is stable at high speed, even when laterally perturbed. High Def Experiments 2 High Speed Stable (very large file): 1201959_HD_StableBicycleExp2.mov (0.7GB) (1920x1080) or on Youtube. This HD video shows that the two-mass-skate (TMS) bicycle is stable at high speed.
 First Successful Run: GB7sv7firstrun.MOV (1.7MB) or on Youtube. The video shows the first successful run with the  experimental primitive bicycle after replacing  the polyurethane “inline skate” wheels with sharp edge aluminum wheels, with a crown radius of 2 mm. Simulation: GB7S4v2fv300.MOV (1.5MB) or on Youtube. The video shows an animation (VRML) of a simulation of the full nonlinear model with with the multibody dynamics software SPACAR. This to check if the system still behaves stably as predicted by the linearized analysis. The initial forward speed is 3 m/s, then after 1 sec the bicycle is laterally perturbed with an initial  leanrate of 0.6 rad/s. The transient dies out and the bicycle comes back up again; stable indeed!

HIGH RES ILLUSTRATIONS:

 Fig 2C from the paper: fig2cStableBicycleExperiment.pdf (119KB) Original photo: fig2cStableBicycleExperimentLarge.jpg (4.9MB) Self-stable experimental TMS bicycle rolling and balancing (photo by Sam Rentmeester/FMAX). Fig 2A from the paper:   fig2aPhysicalStableBicycle.pdf (324KB) Original photo: CIMG0603.JPG (1.6MB) The experimental two-mass-skate (TMS) bicycle. Fig 2B from the paper: fig2bFrontAssembly.pdf (544KB) Original photo: CIMG0592.JPG (1.7MB) Front assembly of the experimental two-mass-skate (TMS) bicycle. A counter-rotating wheel cancels the spin angular momentum. The lines show a small negative trail. Eigentubes: eigentubes7p1.jpg (647KB) (2550x3300) 3D plot of eigenvalues of the theoretical two-mass-skate (TMS) bicycle as a function of speed. Forward speed v is shown on the horizontal x-axis. The vertical axis shows the real part of the eigenvalues. The axis pointing out of the page shows the imaginary part. For speeds where all of the real parts are below the horizontal axis (have negative real part) the TMS bicycle is theoretically stable. This is the rightmost 2/3 of the plot. Negative v corresponds to the bicycle going backwards, which is totally unstable for this bicycle. Rotating the figure 180 degrees about the Im axis reproduces the figure because of the reversibility of the equations of motion (illustration by Peter de Lange). Fig 1A from the paper: fig1aBicycleModel.pdf (30KB) The bicycle model consists of two frames B and H connected by two wheels R and F. The model has a total of 25 geometry and mass-distribution parameters. Central here are the rotary inertia Iyy of the front wheel, the steer axis angle (‘rake’) ls and the trail distance c (positive if contact is behind the steer axis). Depending on the parameter values, as well as gravity g and forward speed v, this bicycle can be self-stable or not. Fig 1B from the paper: fig1bStableBicycleModel.pdf (27KB) A two-mass-skate (TMS) bicycle is a special case. It is described with only 9 free parameters (8 + trail). The wheels have no inertia and are thus effectively ice-skates. The two frames each have a single point mass and no mass moments of inertia. A heavy point mass at the rear skate at the ground contact point can prevent the bicycle from tipping over frontward; because it has no effect on the linearized dynamics it is not shown. Even with negative trail (c < 0, see inset) this non-gyroscopic bicycle can be self-stable. Fig 3A from the paper: fig3aEigenvaluesStableBicycle.pdf (29KB) Stability plot for the experimental TMS stable bicycle. Solutions of the differential equations are exponential functions of time. Stability corresponds to all such solutions having exponential decay (rather than exponential growth). Such decay only occurs if all four of the eigenvalues  li (which are generally complex numbers) have negative real parts. The plot shows calculated eigenvalues as a function of forward speed v. For v > 2.3m/s (the shaded region) the real parts (solid lines) of all eigenvalues are negative (below the horizontal axis) and the bicycle is self-stable. Fig 3B from the paper: fig3bLeanYawRateStableBicycle.pdf (33KB) Transient motion after a disturbance for the experimental TMS bicycle. Measured and predicted lean and yaw (heading) rates of the rear frame are shown. The predicted motions show the theoretical (oscillatory) exponential decay. Not visible in these plots, but visible in high-speed video (Video 4), is a 20 Hz shimmy that is not predicted by the low-dimensional linearized model. CAD model: The CAD model of the experimental two-mass-skate (TMS) bicycle is available in three formats: - SolidWorks GB7Sv9cSolidworksModel.zip (6.7MB) - pdf's of all parts GB7Sv9cProductionDrawings.zip (244KB) - STEP file GB7Sv9cSTEPModel.STEP (2.3MB) Experimental data: The experimental data together with the estimated simulated data which is presented in Fig 3B from the paper, is here presented in this plain ascii text file: 1201959experimentaldata.txt (16KB) The first two lines is a header which explains the contents of each column. Thesis Jodi Kooijman: (coming soon):